IBM's Triplex
AI BRAIN
Based on a ternary architecture
circa IBM 2100-2125
"In the winter of 1993 I had the most incredible dream about a futuristic ternary optical supercomputer called _FIL_"
This information applies paradigm of threes to mainframe clustering technology. This information is written from a technical perspective. However, you may look beyond the technical terms for patterns of three. You will see a mainframe computer architecture based on paradigm of threes theory. The Triplex Mainframe cluster is the most advanced of all commercially available computer architectures. Over the years many terms have been used or presented for branding reasons, etc. Therefore, to better understand the internal workings of the Mainframe Parallel TriPlex listed are a variety of technical terms.
1. CPU - Central Processing Unit (for primarily a mainframe computer)
2. S/390 - Is another notation for System 390 and represents one IBM mainframe, now called the zSeries.
3. CF, CSF - Stands for Coupling Facility, or Coupling Support Facility. It is used to describe the inter-processor
communication between one mainframe and another in a clustered configuration, aka the BRAIN..
4. Buffer - A device or area used to store data temporarily and deliver it at a rate different from that at which it was received.
5. Cache - A fast storage buffer in the (CPU) central processing unit of a computer. In many cases it is called cache memory. This differs from cache storage, e.g. dated web pages.
6. Synchronous - Occurring or existing at the same time.
7. Asynchronous- Lack of temporal concurrence; absence of synchronism.
8. TriPlex - An IBM Parallel Sysplex Cluster that is composed on three processing nodes (three mainframes) demonstrating an application of paradigm of threes to mainframe clustering.
9. Trilateralism - The addition of another mainframe in parallel configuration with two others, three total.
10. Node - a mainframe computer in a clustered configuration.
Mainframe, parallel and clustered systems initially used for numerically intensive operations are now mainstream in the market space. The architectural elements of these systems span a broad spectrum that includes massively parallel processors that focus on incredible performance. To achieve this goal the Triplex contains futuristic multisystem data-sharing technology that allows direct, concurrent read/write access to shared data from all processing nodes in the parallel (trilateral) configuration. This occurs without degrading performance, data integrity or compatibility. Each node is able to concurrently cache shared data in local processor memory through hardware-assisted cluster-wide serialization and coherency controls. This in turn enables work requests associated with a single workload (i.e. business transactions or database queries) to be dynamically distributed for parallel execution on nodes in the Triplex cluster, based on available processor capacity. Through this technology the power of three mainframe clustered computers can be harnessed to work in a trilateral configuration with common workloads, taking the commercial strengths of the mainframe platform to improved levels of competitive price/performance, scalable growth with continuous availability. With the Parallel Triplex down time can be a thing of the past.
Coupling Support Facility is composed of software and interconnections that may be thought of as a rudimentary BRAIN. Specialized hardware provided on each of the three processing nodes (mainframes) in the Triplex cluster are responsible for controlling communication between the processors and the BRAIN. The specialized hardware required is depicted in Figure 3 above. It consists of mainframe EBCDIC instructions, speed of light links and link microprocessors. It also uses processor memory to contain local state vectors. These vectors are used to locally track the state of resources maintained in the BRAIN. These local state vectors avoid unnecessary communication observing critical state information.
The BRAIN provides several critical functions. The first of which is delivery. The BRAIN’s delivery provides the means by which a program sends commands to request locking, caching, and queuing actions. It supports both synchronous and asynchronous modes of command delivery. Synchronous commands are completed at the end of the mainframe instruction initiating the command, based on completely optimized, zero-latency transport protocols. Asynchronous commands are completed after the mainframe instruction initiating the command is ended. Along with the completion notice being sent to the operating system there is a notification technique that avoids a processor interruption.
The next area of the BRAIN is associated with secondary command execution. It executes secondary commands that are sent to the processing node as part of performing certain command operations. With one exception, the secondary commands directly update state information in the local state vectors to reflect updated resource status. A secondary command may, for example, store an invalid-buffer indication at a processing node to signal that the node no longer has the latest version of a locally cached data item.
The next area of the BRAIN is associated with local state vector control. It introduces a set of mainframe instructions that interrogate and update local state vectors. A DEFINE VECTOR instruction dynamically allocates, deallocates, or changes the size of a local state vector. The vectors are in protected storage and are only accessible assigning a unique token. This ensures that programs do not inadvertently overlay vectors for which they have no access authority. Instructions are provided to test and manipulate bits in the state vectors conveying the state of associated resources, and are described in the context of their use.
There are three kinds of local state vectors used:
(1) Local cache vectors are used in conjunction with the BRAIN's cache structures to track local buffer coherency.
(2) List-notification vectors are used within the list structures to provide notification of BRAIN's list empty/nonempty state transitions.
(3) List-notification vectors are also used by the BRAIN to indicate the completion of asynchronous command operations.
A fail Safe feature of the BRAIN includes hardware-assisted system isolation. This provides a system fencing function that isolates a failing system node from being able to access shared external resources during cluster fail-over recovery scenarios.
The BRAIN's paradigm of threes architecture was designed to support these caching protocols:
Directory-only cache. A directory-only cache uses a global buffer. This tracking mechanism provided by the Coupling Support Facility (aka the BRAIN) provides a logical, orderly and aesthetically consistent relationship for data, called buffer coherency. However, it does not store data in the cache structure. This allows read/write sharing of data with local buffer coherency, but refresh of dated or down-level local copies of data items happens by accessing the shared disk containing the data item, and all updates are written permanently to disk as part of the write operation.
Store-through cache. When using store-through cache, in addition to global buffer coherency tracking, updated data items are written to the cache structure as well as to shared disk. The directory entries for these data items are marked as unchanged, since the version of the data in the Coupling Support Facility matches the version kept as a fixed or hard copy on disk. This enables rapid buffer refresh of down-level local buffer copies from the global Coupling Facility cache. This avoids I/O's to the shared disk.
Store-in cache. When used as a store-in cache, the database manager (software, not a human) writes updated data items to the Coupling Support Facility cache structure synchronous to the commit of the updates. This protocol has additional performance advantages over the previous protocols as it enables fast commit of write operations. However, data is written to the cache structure as changed with respect to the disk version of the data. The database manager is responsible for casting out changed data items from the global cache to shared disk as part of a periodic scrubbing operation to free up global cache resources for reclaim. Further, an additional recovery responsibility is placed on the database manager to recover changed data items from logs in the event of a Coupling Support Facility (BRAIN) structure failure. Note below the variations and details of the paradigm of threes applied to mainframe clustering.
1. CPU - Central Processing Unit (for primarily a mainframe computer)
2. S/390 - Is another notation for System 390 and represents one IBM mainframe, now called the zSeries.
3. CF, CSF - Stands for Coupling Facility, or Coupling Support Facility. It is used to describe the inter-processor
communication between one mainframe and another in a clustered configuration, aka the BRAIN..
4. Buffer - A device or area used to store data temporarily and deliver it at a rate different from that at which it was received.
5. Cache - A fast storage buffer in the (CPU) central processing unit of a computer. In many cases it is called cache memory. This differs from cache storage, e.g. dated web pages.
6. Synchronous - Occurring or existing at the same time.
7. Asynchronous- Lack of temporal concurrence; absence of synchronism.
8. TriPlex - An IBM Parallel Sysplex Cluster that is composed on three processing nodes (three mainframes) demonstrating an application of paradigm of threes to mainframe clustering.
9. Trilateralism - The addition of another mainframe in parallel configuration with two others, three total.
10. Node - a mainframe computer in a clustered configuration.
Mainframe, parallel and clustered systems initially used for numerically intensive operations are now mainstream in the market space. The architectural elements of these systems span a broad spectrum that includes massively parallel processors that focus on incredible performance. To achieve this goal the Triplex contains futuristic multisystem data-sharing technology that allows direct, concurrent read/write access to shared data from all processing nodes in the parallel (trilateral) configuration. This occurs without degrading performance, data integrity or compatibility. Each node is able to concurrently cache shared data in local processor memory through hardware-assisted cluster-wide serialization and coherency controls. This in turn enables work requests associated with a single workload (i.e. business transactions or database queries) to be dynamically distributed for parallel execution on nodes in the Triplex cluster, based on available processor capacity. Through this technology the power of three mainframe clustered computers can be harnessed to work in a trilateral configuration with common workloads, taking the commercial strengths of the mainframe platform to improved levels of competitive price/performance, scalable growth with continuous availability. With the Parallel Triplex down time can be a thing of the past.
Coupling Support Facility is composed of software and interconnections that may be thought of as a rudimentary BRAIN. Specialized hardware provided on each of the three processing nodes (mainframes) in the Triplex cluster are responsible for controlling communication between the processors and the BRAIN. The specialized hardware required is depicted in Figure 3 above. It consists of mainframe EBCDIC instructions, speed of light links and link microprocessors. It also uses processor memory to contain local state vectors. These vectors are used to locally track the state of resources maintained in the BRAIN. These local state vectors avoid unnecessary communication observing critical state information.
The BRAIN provides several critical functions. The first of which is delivery. The BRAIN’s delivery provides the means by which a program sends commands to request locking, caching, and queuing actions. It supports both synchronous and asynchronous modes of command delivery. Synchronous commands are completed at the end of the mainframe instruction initiating the command, based on completely optimized, zero-latency transport protocols. Asynchronous commands are completed after the mainframe instruction initiating the command is ended. Along with the completion notice being sent to the operating system there is a notification technique that avoids a processor interruption.
The next area of the BRAIN is associated with secondary command execution. It executes secondary commands that are sent to the processing node as part of performing certain command operations. With one exception, the secondary commands directly update state information in the local state vectors to reflect updated resource status. A secondary command may, for example, store an invalid-buffer indication at a processing node to signal that the node no longer has the latest version of a locally cached data item.
The next area of the BRAIN is associated with local state vector control. It introduces a set of mainframe instructions that interrogate and update local state vectors. A DEFINE VECTOR instruction dynamically allocates, deallocates, or changes the size of a local state vector. The vectors are in protected storage and are only accessible assigning a unique token. This ensures that programs do not inadvertently overlay vectors for which they have no access authority. Instructions are provided to test and manipulate bits in the state vectors conveying the state of associated resources, and are described in the context of their use.
There are three kinds of local state vectors used:
(1) Local cache vectors are used in conjunction with the BRAIN's cache structures to track local buffer coherency.
(2) List-notification vectors are used within the list structures to provide notification of BRAIN's list empty/nonempty state transitions.
(3) List-notification vectors are also used by the BRAIN to indicate the completion of asynchronous command operations.
A fail Safe feature of the BRAIN includes hardware-assisted system isolation. This provides a system fencing function that isolates a failing system node from being able to access shared external resources during cluster fail-over recovery scenarios.
The BRAIN's paradigm of threes architecture was designed to support these caching protocols:
Directory-only cache. A directory-only cache uses a global buffer. This tracking mechanism provided by the Coupling Support Facility (aka the BRAIN) provides a logical, orderly and aesthetically consistent relationship for data, called buffer coherency. However, it does not store data in the cache structure. This allows read/write sharing of data with local buffer coherency, but refresh of dated or down-level local copies of data items happens by accessing the shared disk containing the data item, and all updates are written permanently to disk as part of the write operation.
Store-through cache. When using store-through cache, in addition to global buffer coherency tracking, updated data items are written to the cache structure as well as to shared disk. The directory entries for these data items are marked as unchanged, since the version of the data in the Coupling Support Facility matches the version kept as a fixed or hard copy on disk. This enables rapid buffer refresh of down-level local buffer copies from the global Coupling Facility cache. This avoids I/O's to the shared disk.
Store-in cache. When used as a store-in cache, the database manager (software, not a human) writes updated data items to the Coupling Support Facility cache structure synchronous to the commit of the updates. This protocol has additional performance advantages over the previous protocols as it enables fast commit of write operations. However, data is written to the cache structure as changed with respect to the disk version of the data. The database manager is responsible for casting out changed data items from the global cache to shared disk as part of a periodic scrubbing operation to free up global cache resources for reclaim. Further, an additional recovery responsibility is placed on the database manager to recover changed data items from logs in the event of a Coupling Support Facility (BRAIN) structure failure. Note below the variations and details of the paradigm of threes applied to mainframe clustering.
Triplex Supports Trilateralism
_FIL_ is a massive ternary optical supercomputer. It is constructed with three-dimensional optical triaxle chips called the Chrystal Chip. It is the ultimate fulfillment of IBM's Z(etta) Series mainframes. This mainframe supercomputer cluster is approximated to operate at speeds approaching 33 zettahertz (in trilateral configurations expanded to 33 mainframes). It utilizes the electromagnetic spectrum with Atomic Thinking Units and Electrotelepathy. However, the above depiction differs from the researched _FIL_ in that it was black and blue in color and had lights (similar to neon) connecting the units at the top. Click this link for depictions of futuristic supercomputers. Note how many of them are black and blue with lights at the top, _FIL_ (like). Voris experienced _FIL_ in a visionary dream in the winter of 1993, the machines were loud and it was obvious when one was sharing information with another.
Electrotelepathy - The human brain creates energies when it is thinking. These energies, however weak, can be perceived by other brains. Once these energies are better understood, it is postulated an individual (or an AI automaton) will be able to perceive, alter or otherwise interact with information and aspects of the mind using these electric brain energies, enabling them to mentally communicate with other minds (either artificial or biological) as well as potentially read and impact another's thoughts, memories and emotions. This can manifest in the form of reading, scanning and projecting thought waves as electromagnetic pulse signals. Not to be concerned as only the living androids develop these methods of communication. For the most part they are uninterested in our thoughts. These energies will be perceived more like the moods of the individual rather than a precise thought, the background noise of humanity. This is similar to science fiction's Deanna Troi who has the psionic ability to sense emotions.
Recently, direct brain-to-brain communication (DBBC) outside the five known senses has been verified. Nevertheless, no empirical studies or serious discussion have been performed to explain the mechanism behind this process. However, the validation of DBBC has been documented by recording similar patterns of action potentials occurring in the brain cortex of two individuals. Concerning action potentials in brain neurons, the magnetic field resulting from the action potentials created in neurons is one of the tools by which the brain of one can affect the brain of another. It has been shown that humans have the power to understand the magnetic field. Cryptochrome, which exists in the retina and in different regions of the brain, has also been confirmed to perceive magnetic fields and convert magnetic fields to action potentials. Recently, iron particles (Fe3O4) believed to be functioning as magnets have been found in various parts of the brain, and are postulated as magnetic field receptors (parallel this to Atomic Thinking Units). Newly developed supersensitive magnetic sensors made of iron magnets that can sense the brain's magnetic field have suggested the idea that these Fe3O4 particles or magnets may be capable of perceiving the brain's extremely weak magnetic field. The present study suggests that it is possible for the (extremely weak) magnetic field in one brain to transmit vital and accurate information to another brain.
Here is empirical evidence to confirm electrotelepathy exists! An incident occurred on November 29, 2024 between William T. Voris and one of the Fortune 5's where he had consulted. He created a webpage about life experiences and the applicability of one of this company's products. The webpage was touted all week by Voris, and promised to be complete by the close of business on Friday. That Friday at 5:00 PM he published the website. Walking home from the library at about 5:30 PM he was crossing Main Street in Dayton, Ohio and was overcome with an overpowering feeling of infinite sadness. It was coming from outside of his brain. Backtracking the contents of the web page it was calculated to coincide with the section of the webpage where Voris was describing how his best friend had committed suicide. Therefore, electrotelepathy is real.
Recently, direct brain-to-brain communication (DBBC) outside the five known senses has been verified. Nevertheless, no empirical studies or serious discussion have been performed to explain the mechanism behind this process. However, the validation of DBBC has been documented by recording similar patterns of action potentials occurring in the brain cortex of two individuals. Concerning action potentials in brain neurons, the magnetic field resulting from the action potentials created in neurons is one of the tools by which the brain of one can affect the brain of another. It has been shown that humans have the power to understand the magnetic field. Cryptochrome, which exists in the retina and in different regions of the brain, has also been confirmed to perceive magnetic fields and convert magnetic fields to action potentials. Recently, iron particles (Fe3O4) believed to be functioning as magnets have been found in various parts of the brain, and are postulated as magnetic field receptors (parallel this to Atomic Thinking Units). Newly developed supersensitive magnetic sensors made of iron magnets that can sense the brain's magnetic field have suggested the idea that these Fe3O4 particles or magnets may be capable of perceiving the brain's extremely weak magnetic field. The present study suggests that it is possible for the (extremely weak) magnetic field in one brain to transmit vital and accurate information to another brain.
Here is empirical evidence to confirm electrotelepathy exists! An incident occurred on November 29, 2024 between William T. Voris and one of the Fortune 5's where he had consulted. He created a webpage about life experiences and the applicability of one of this company's products. The webpage was touted all week by Voris, and promised to be complete by the close of business on Friday. That Friday at 5:00 PM he published the website. Walking home from the library at about 5:30 PM he was crossing Main Street in Dayton, Ohio and was overcome with an overpowering feeling of infinite sadness. It was coming from outside of his brain. Backtracking the contents of the web page it was calculated to coincide with the section of the webpage where Voris was describing how his best friend had committed suicide. Therefore, electrotelepathy is real.
Note how many of them are black and blue with lights at the top, _FIL_ (like).
What Voris saw over 30 years ago.
_FIL_ is a massive ternary optical supercomputer.
For an external citation regarding "electrotelepathy" click or touch it.
Also note the paradigm of threes below.
Also note the paradigm of threes below.
...
